ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Xen Orchestra - Permissions Issue - File level restore

    IT Discussion
    xen orchestra permissions debian 8
    4
    74
    8.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DanpD
      Danp
      last edited by

      This is what I get

      xoadmin@xo-5:~$ whereis fusermount
fusermount: /bin/fusermount /usr/share/man/man1/fusermount.1.gz

      Guessing that you either don't have it properly installed or it isn't in a location where it can be found.

      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DustinB3403D
        DustinB3403 @Danp
        last edited by

        @Danp Do you have SSHFS installed?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403
          last edited by

          One sec, Fuse not installed on debian by default... FML... repo added installing fuse.

          Rebooting and then recompiling..

          DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • DanpD
            Danp @DustinB3403
            last edited by

            @DustinB3403 Thought you did that yesterday. Did you rebuild from scratch?

            DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403 @Danp
              last edited by

              @Danp said in Xen Orchestra - Permissions Issue - File level restore:

              @DustinB3403 Thought you did that yesterday. Did you rebuild from scratch?

              No I added the universal repo yesterday for something else that was needed.

              Anyways, now trying to mount a single backup I get

              Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:15:18 GMT xo:api [email protected] | backup.scanDisk(...) [1s] ==> object
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: { [Error: Command failed: mount --options=loop,ro --source=/tmp/tmp-416paluKS1uHkUS/vhdi7 --target=/tmp/tmp-4160yW3G6ma9LZP
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0,
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: missing codepage or helper program, or other error
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: dmesg | tail or so.
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: ]
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: code: 32,
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: killed: false,
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: stdout: '',
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: stderr: 'mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0,\n       missing codepage or helper program, or other error\n\n       In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try\n       dmesg | tail or so.\n',
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: failed: true,
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: signal: null,
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: cmd: 'mount --options=loop,ro --source=/tmp/tmp-416paluKS1uHkUS/vhdi7 --target=/tmp/tmp-4160yW3G6ma9LZP' }
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 19:15:18 GMT xo:api [email protected] | backup.scanFiles(...) [218ms] =!> Error: Command failed: mount --options=loop,ro --source=/tmp/tmp-416paluKS1uHkUS/vhdi7 --target=/tmp/tmp-4160yW3G6ma9LZP
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0,
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: missing codepage or helper program, or other error
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
Dec 21 14:15:18 xo-test-debian-3 xo-server[416]: dmesg | tail or so.

              Trying another backup . oh and dmesg | tail contains

              10.867971] Adding 392188k swap on /dev/xvda5.  Priority:-1 extents:1 across:392188k SSFS
13.590095] RPC: Registered named UNIX socket transport module.
13.590099] RPC: Registered udp transport module.
13.590100] RPC: Registered tcp transport module.
13.590101] RPC: Registered tcp NFSv4.1 backchannel transport module.
13.633648] FS-Cache: Loaded
13.681056] FS-Cache: Netfs 'nfs' registered for caching
13.943515] Installing knfsd (copyright (C) 1996 [email protected]).
86.204993] fuse init (API version 7.23)
86.635229] loop: module loaded
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DustinB3403D
                DustinB3403
                last edited by

                Seems to be specific to that backup, as I am able to restore files to my file server now without issue.

                So a few things to we should try to compile into the update script, check for fuse, and install it if its not there.

                DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403
                  last edited by DustinB3403

                  Another is listing things like this....

                  398.675872] ntfs: (device loop0): ntfs_readdir(): Directory index record with vcn 0x0 is corrupt.  Corrupt inode 0xe96b9.  Run chkdsk.
398.675890] ntfs: (device loop0): ntfs_readdir(): Directory index record with vcn 0x0 is corrupt.  Corrupt inode 0xe96b9.  Run chkdsk.

                  So yeah.. gonna run a check disk on my VM here..

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DanpD
                    Danp @DustinB3403
                    last edited by

                    @DustinB3403 said in Xen Orchestra - Permissions Issue - File level restore:

                    Seems to be specific to that backup, as I am able to restore files to my file server now without issue.

                    So a few things to we should try to compile into the update script, check for fuse, and install it if its not there.

                    Also for libvhdi-utils

                    DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403 @Danp
                      last edited by

                      @Danp That was the other thing, that I installed yesterday.

                      libvhdi-utils

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403
                        last edited by

                        This would list if the packaged is installed, so how to pipe that output into the next part would be the question.

                        dpkg --get-selections | grep libvhdi-utils
libvhdi-utils                                     install
                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DanpD
                          Danp
                          last edited by

                          Found this code on the interweb. I would think either the 2nd or 3rd solution would work fine for our needs.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DustinB3403D
                            DustinB3403
                            last edited by DustinB3403

                            Yeah, this might be the easiest solution...

                            if [ $(dpkg-query -W -f='${Status}' nano 2>/dev/null | grep -c "ok installed") -eq 0 ];
then
  apt-get install nano;
fi

                            Might need to throw up a flag or warning if the package can't be found though. Like in my case I had to add the universal repo to my debian installation before I could install libvhdi-util and fuse.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DanpD
                              Danp
                              last edited by

                              Should be able to check the exit code from apt-get. Now to wrap the whole thing into a nice little function that we can reuse in the future. 😉

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DanpD
                                Danp
                                last edited by

                                5.5.2 is out. Grab it while it's hot!

                                BRRABillB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • BRRABillB
                                  BRRABill @Danp
                                  last edited by

                                  @Danp said in Xen Orchestra - Permissions Issue - File level restore:

                                  5.5.2 is out. Grab it while it's hot!

                                  Hmmm, I am glad I didn't have time to futz with the other version!

                                  I actually don't even have XO backups set up yet. Still doing agents from inside the VMs since it works awesomely and I just haven't had time to play with XO.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • DanpD
                                    Danp
                                    last edited by

                                    Yeah... usually best to wait a few days for them to work out any kinks before upgrading production systems. 😉

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DustinB3403D
                                      DustinB3403
                                      last edited by

                                      Upgraded and back to stable release.

                                      Have you had any progress with the wrong fs type issue? Do you have a open issue ticket?

                                      DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • DanpD
                                        Danp @DustinB3403
                                        last edited by

                                        @DustinB3403 No. There's an active thread over on the XO forum. I was just getting ready to post over there. Think I may have found the cause.

                                        DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • DustinB3403D
                                          DustinB3403 @Danp
                                          last edited by

                                          @Danp nice, post a link and I can test as well. I'm busy with another issue, so I'll have to play catch up.

                                          DanpD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • DanpD
                                            Danp @DustinB3403
                                            last edited by

                                            @DustinB3403 Looks like Ubuntu has an older version of vhdimount in the repository. Can you post the output from vhdimount -V?

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 3 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post