ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    VMware Axes the Workstation and Fusion Teams

    News
    vmware vmware workstation vmware fusion the register
    11
    36
    7.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @aaron-closed account
      last edited by

      @aaron said:

      This is disappointing, I like Fusion. I will never buy Parallels again after they started serving me pop-up advertising to the VM host.

      I never liked any of them. VirtualBox is So good.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @aaron-closed account
        last edited by

        @aaron said:

        This is disappointing, I like Fusion. I will never buy Parallels again after they started serving me pop-up advertising to the VM host.

        I have used Parallels since version 7 or so and have never seen this.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender @Kelly
          last edited by

          @Kelly said:

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @Kelly said:

          @scottalanmiller said:

          @Kelly said:

          Flexibility and control mostly. So they can work from home or remotely without the tax of VPN.

          There must be a piece missing here, how does the VirtualBox instance remove the need for a VPN?

          They are running the computations locally on their laptop.

          Can't they run them on the base OS?

          The tools they need run much better in Linux, and these are all MBPs.

          The idea of running this locally seems weird - why wouldn't you want to use the power available in a DC instead of the mundane amount on a laptop? unless of course the DC is either overloaded or just has old junk hardware.

          This whole situation just seems weird to me.

          KellyK MattSpellerM 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • KellyK
            Kelly @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender said:

            @Kelly said:

            @scottalanmiller said:

            @Kelly said:

            @scottalanmiller said:

            @Kelly said:

            Flexibility and control mostly. So they can work from home or remotely without the tax of VPN.

            There must be a piece missing here, how does the VirtualBox instance remove the need for a VPN?

            They are running the computations locally on their laptop.

            Can't they run them on the base OS?

            The tools they need run much better in Linux, and these are all MBPs.

            The idea of running this locally seems weird - why wouldn't you want to use the power available in a DC instead of the mundane amount on a laptop? unless of course the DC is either overloaded or just has old junk hardware.

            This whole situation just seems weird to me.

            Yup, decisions were made. Some good, some bad. Either way, that is the culture here, now. I'm working toward something that might move the compute to servers, but it will take time.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • Deleted74295D
              Deleted74295 Banned @Kelly
              last edited by

              @Kelly said:

              We've already had one agency tell us that we cannot use any Lenovo hardware in support of their systems.

              Falls off chair

              An agency actually said no to Lenovo products?!?

              travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • travisdh1T
                travisdh1 @Deleted74295
                last edited by

                @Breffni-Potter said:

                @Kelly said:

                We've already had one agency tell us that we cannot use any Lenovo hardware in support of their systems.

                Falls off chair

                An agency actually said no to Lenovo products?!?

                Anyone paying any attention at all to security would be doing that right now. Not surprising at all.

                JaredBuschJ DashrenderD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Kelly
                  last edited by

                  @Kelly said:

                  We've already had one agency tell us that we cannot use any Lenovo hardware in support of their systems.

                  That is so awesome.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @travisdh1
                    last edited by

                    @travisdh1 said:

                    Anyone paying any attention at all to security would be doing that right now. Not surprising at all.

                    This is the surprising part..

                    Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @travisdh1
                      last edited by

                      @travisdh1 said:

                      @Breffni-Potter said:

                      @Kelly said:

                      We've already had one agency tell us that we cannot use any Lenovo hardware in support of their systems.

                      Falls off chair

                      An agency actually said no to Lenovo products?!?

                      Anyone paying any attention at all to security would be doing that right now. Not surprising at all.

                      Yeah actually it's quite surprising that someone that high up would be willing to listen and do the right thing.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • Deleted74295D
                        Deleted74295 Banned @JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        @JaredBusch said:

                        @travisdh1 said:

                        Anyone paying any attention at all to security would be doing that right now. Not surprising at all.

                        This is the surprising part..

                        Hence my fall off the chair reaction...

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • MattSpellerM
                          MattSpeller @Dashrender
                          last edited by MattSpeller

                          @Dashrender said:

                          The idea of running this locally seems weird - why wouldn't you want to use the power available in a DC instead of the mundane amount on a laptop?

                          I used to enjoy workstation as it was a slick way to spin up vm's on my laptop for testing stuff. Switched to virtualbox and haven't looked back.

                          Edit: related note, if you think that'd be handy for yourself too, get a 500gb SSD and 16/32GB of RAM. You can have VM's up and down in only seconds. This is on a cheap i5-3210M 2.5ghz, nothing fancy.

                          DashrenderD stacksofplatesS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender @MattSpeller
                            last edited by

                            @MattSpeller said:

                            @Dashrender said:

                            The idea of running this locally seems weird - why wouldn't you want to use the power available in a DC instead of the mundane amount on a laptop?

                            I used to enjoy workstation as it was a slick way to spin up vm's on my laptop for testing stuff. Switched to virtualbox and haven't looked back.

                            Edit: related note, if you think that'd be handy for yourself too, get a 500gb SSD and 16/32GB of RAM. You can have VM's up and down in only seconds. This is on a cheap i5-3210M 2.5ghz, nothing fancy.

                            You're not the use case we were talking about though. They are crunching numbers, etc - that sounds like something that should be kept in-house (in datacenter), not randomly running on some laptop that someone takes home.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              Depends how and where they are using the numbers and how much crunching needs to be done.

                              MattSpellerM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • MattSpellerM
                                MattSpeller @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller I agree on @Dashrender with this one, production stuff should be on production gear unless it's a really tiny job

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • stacksofplatesS
                                  stacksofplates @MattSpeller
                                  last edited by

                                  @MattSpeller said:

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  The idea of running this locally seems weird - why wouldn't you want to use the power available in a DC instead of the mundane amount on a laptop?

                                  I used to enjoy workstation as it was a slick way to spin up vm's on my laptop for testing stuff. Switched to virtualbox and haven't looked back.

                                  Edit: related note, if you think that'd be handy for yourself too, get a 500gb SSD and 16/32GB of RAM. You can have VM's up and down in only seconds. This is on a cheap i5-3210M 2.5ghz, nothing fancy.

                                  I used VirtualBox, and then now if I need a VM with a GUI I just use KVM on my laptop. However, if I'm testing server stuff I just use LXC. It's so much faster.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller @MattSpeller
                                    last edited by

                                    @MattSpeller said:

                                    @scottalanmiller I agree on @Dashrender with this one, production stuff should be on production gear unless it's a really tiny job

                                    Well we pretty much know the size, if it runs in a VM on a Type 2, it's not big. And if we are just talking about some math, what's the purpose of production gear?

                                    My dad used to do linear algebra for Eastman Kodak. He could use the mainframe when needed, but mostly they just bought him a high end laptop and let him take it home. Meant he could do his math modeling anywhere, anytime. Was much more flexible. Unless he had a rush job, no reason to tie up the mainframe.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • 1
                                    • 2
                                    • 2 / 2
                                    • First post
                                      Last post