Onedrive is shrinking
-
@Dashrender said:
So this makes me wonder - let's assume the same problem exists today, that the formatting between LibreOffice and MS Office don't mix well. Would you suggest moving to LO for the 99%, and then @BRRABill company have one or two Office installs to fix the files when the client asks for them in an editable format?
Good thinking. That's kind of where we are. I have LibreOffice since I'm on Linux. My secretary has MS Office 2013. Never comes up, but if she needed to tweak my files she could.
I know that formatting issues can exist, but in my own experience I've only run into issues personally dealing with people using Word and me also using Word, never when I ran OO or LO.
-
@Dashrender said:
As I stated before, this is why we didn't go that route. Our existing documents did not look correct when we opened them in OpenOffice. I'm assuming the same would be true for documents created in OO would not look as intended in Office 2007 at the time.
It was a train wreck. We do lots of custom tables and charts and stuff. OO (Open Office? I always check my acronyms here) was a mess and a half.
Everyone works on these files in the office, so it doesn't really make sense to have a mixed usage of Office and OO.
But, that was years ago ... who knows today? We could certainly try.
But it was SOOOO bad before, anyone here would be very hesitant, including myself.
-
Yes, OO is OpenOffice
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Yes, OO is OpenOffice
So Dropbox Business isn't short enough to abbreviate and Open Office is?
I see how this goes. The rookies don't get the acronyms.
-
That's correct. No rookies making acronyms. Dont' get cocky, kid.
-
-
I keep forgetting... if you give MS Office users files in OpenDocument format, what happens? That's a "Word Document" to MS Office users. MS Office opens LibreOffice documents. So working in LibreOffice does not stop MS Office users from using your source files in any way. They get to feel like they are getting a Word document.
-
Also wondering, for people who have had compatibility issues, was this with the modern XML formats or the old ones? Microsoft's move to XML formats is what really changed things.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Also wondering, for people who have had compatibility issues, was this with the modern XML formats or the old ones? Microsoft's move to XML formats is what really changed things.
For me, it was a long time ago.
But as I have said, it's an issue within MS Office itself. We tried to move to Office 2010. We gave it to the user who creates these documents. Worked great for her, but everyone else in 2007 got messed up tables and graphs. So we stayed on 2007.
-
Oh, I missed that. So you actually have an issue with MS Office to MS Office compatibility? How does that work with sending files to the customers then? They can't realistically be running MS Office 2007 too, can they?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Oh, I missed that. So you actually have an issue with MS Office to MS Office compatibility? How does that work with sending files to the customers then? They can't realistically be running MS Office 2007 too, can they?
You know ... that's a good question.
The last we checked, they were on version equal to our previous to ours.
We definitely send PDFs to most.
See? Your solutions always come around in the end!
-
I like to believe that that is true
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Also wondering, for people who have had compatibility issues, was this with the modern XML formats or the old ones? Microsoft's move to XML formats is what really changed things.
We've had compatibility issues with both formats, old and new. Sometimes they are barely noticeable but other time they are pretty severe. For example on this simple presentation, Impress on the right, changes the size of the title. Considering the page is simple text and a couple lists, it's quite strange is could have the title be the same size as the original.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Also wondering, for people who have had compatibility issues, was this with the modern XML formats or the old ones? Microsoft's move to XML formats is what really changed things.
For me it was old ones. I was looking in 2008, shortly after Office 2007 and XML versions came out, but before we started using it.
You're making it sound like things are much better today.
-
@Romo Is that both office suites running on the same OS?
-
@scottalanmiller Yes
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Also wondering, for people who have had compatibility issues, was this with the modern XML formats or the old ones? Microsoft's move to XML formats is what really changed things.
For me it was old ones. I was looking in 2008, shortly after Office 2007 and XML versions came out, but before we started using it.
You're making it sound like things are much better today.
I noticed an improvement when the XML formats released. Don't know if things have improved since that point. I don't often see issues, but I don't often see attempts, either.
Sounds like we need to run some tests!
-
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Romo said:
@scottalanmiller Yes
So can't be font related then.
These are exactly the types of problems that I saw back in 2008. Even as something as simple as what Romo is showing. Why are they different?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Romo said:
@scottalanmiller Yes
So can't be font related then.
No, same computer same fonts.
