ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Solved ScreenConnect Install on Fedora 23

    Announcements
    screenconnect rpm fedora 23 linux fedora
    4
    13
    3.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      I know that it is very new, so I am not likely to find anyone who has tried this yet, but has anyone had any luck getting the ScreenConnect RPM package to install to Fedora 23? This is a stock install of Fedora 23 workstation so that means the Gnome 23 desktop environment, no special packages, vanilla install with SC being the first thing attempting to install.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • stacksofplatesS
        stacksofplates
        last edited by

        I'm on the road but ill look when I get home.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @stacksofplates
          last edited by

          @johnhooks said:

          I'm on the road but ill look when I get home.

          Thanks.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • stacksofplatesS
            stacksofplates
            last edited by stacksofplates

            So I thought I would be able to download the client without having an account. I guess not, ha. I guess I won't be of much help then.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              The client RPM doesn't come from their site but from your own SC server 🙂

              stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • stacksofplatesS
                stacksofplates @scottalanmiller
                last edited by stacksofplates

                @scottalanmiller said:

                The client RPM doesn't come from their site but from your own SC server 🙂

                Oh ok. Well since I don't subscribe to their service I guess you're on your own.

                But out of curiosity, is it worth $39 per tech per month?

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • Minion QueenM
                  Minion Queen Banned
                  last edited by

                  We subscribed to this over a year ago when their fees were a one time thing. YES it was worth it. So much more stable than LogMeIn.

                  stacksofplatesS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    It's been great and the cost was very different back when we got it. It is the best system I have ever used for this. Stable, fast, easy to use and flexible.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                    • stacksofplatesS
                      stacksofplates @Minion Queen
                      last edited by

                      @Minion-Queen said:

                      We subscribed to this over a year ago when their fees were a one time thing. YES it was worth it. So much more stable than LogMeIn.

                      The one time fee makes sense. Im cheap so I try to do everything free if I can haha.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        One time fee versus subscription doesn't make it cheaper or more expensive, just capex versus opex. I generally prefer opex, but it is TCO that really matters.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          They still have a one time fee option. just priced differently.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            Just a quick follow up: This has not been forgotten but in the interim we had to deploy a Linux Mint instance instead and the Fedora 23 testing is going to wait until we have the new lab system online and it will be tested there. It is still on the docket, just a few weeks out.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              We moved to a different Linux choice and Fedora 24 released. So closing this out as unneeded.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • 1 / 1
                              • First post
                                Last post