ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Client system overhaul

    IT Discussion
    8
    40
    8.7k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • C
      Carnival Boy
      last edited by

      Maybe virtualise Server 1, then use Veeam to backup to both NASs (on-site and off-site)?

      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • PSX_DefectorP
        PSX_Defector
        last edited by

        Didn't say what NAS they have, but NetApp has the ever so useful Snapmirror, which will replicate all the data to another device automagically.

        http://www.netapp.com/us/products/protection-software/snapmirror.aspx

        Performing replication is gonna depend on how fast they want to recover. Using things like Veeam to send data back and forth is fine, but the delta would be kind of a problem. Using snapmirror would replicate in real time and recovery would be within seconds.

        I would beef up the two servers, slap all of the VMs on one, run Veeam to clone across to the secondary for local redundancy, keep critical data on the NAS and shuffle the data over to the offsite backup with the other NAS.

        DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • gjacobseG
          gjacobse
          last edited by

          Are they looking to replace both with new hardware? or just reallocate what they have?

          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
            last edited by

            @Carnival-Boy said:

            Maybe virtualise Server 1, then use Veeam to backup to both NASs (on-site and off-site)?

            That's the obvious starting point. Get everything onto HyperV as a starting point. The best tool for backups is starting from virtualization. Physical servers have many caveats, difficulty and expense in backups is a key one.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @gjacobse
              last edited by

              @gjacobse said:

              Are they looking to replace both with new hardware? or just reallocate what they have?

              Good question. A single new server would handle everything here easily. But as he mentioned available capacity (how did you determine that only 1 vCPU was available - that's not how capacity works) it seems like they are trying to use what they have currently.

              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @PSX_Defector
                last edited by

                @PSX_Defector said:

                Didn't say what NAS they have, but NetApp has the ever so useful Snapmirror, which will replicate all the data to another device automagically.

                http://www.netapp.com/us/products/protection-software/snapmirror.aspx

                Performing replication is gonna depend on how fast they want to recover. Using things like Veeam to send data back and forth is fine, but the delta would be kind of a problem. Using snapmirror would replicate in real time and recovery would be within seconds.

                I would beef up the two servers, slap all of the VMs on one, run Veeam to clone across to the secondary for local redundancy, keep critical data on the NAS and shuffle the data over to the offsite backup with the other NAS.

                This would require a significant storage purchase at minimum, but not a bad idea, assuming the system will hold enough disk that is.

                PSX_DefectorP scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @gjacobse said:

                  Are they looking to replace both with new hardware? or just reallocate what they have?

                  Good question. A single new server would handle everything here easily. But as he mentioned available capacity (how did you determine that only 1 vCPU was available - that's not how capacity works) it seems like they are trying to use what they have currently.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    The plan is to use the hardware they have, no replacements.

                    I don't recall what type of NASs they were, but it was mentioned that they could possibly self sync, so PSX's solution might be the play for offsites.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DustinB3403D
                      DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      So the client doesn't want to spend on hardware, but is willing to spend on software to use the equipment they have; to implement an onsite/offsite backup solution.

                      Correct?

                      Are Disks even on the table to be purchased?

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DashrenderD
                        Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        I've updated the first post a bit.

                        My associate said that they are sure there are enough resources to load up an additional VM and give is approx 40 GB of storage on the host. As for the 1 VCPU and 4 GB RAM, I was guesstimating that we could pull at least that amount of resources for this additional VM.

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DustinB3403D
                          DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          Maybe use Powershell to perform full VSS backup to the onsite NAS, and use the built in tools on that to backup to the offsite unit.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • DashrenderD
                            Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            My proposal followed most of yours.

                            First, virtualize Server 1. This should be pretty straight forward, just install the Hyper-V role in Server 2008, done.

                            Then stand up another VM on Server 2, install Windows server (might have to buy license), and install Veeam. Use the local NAS as the target to backup both VMs. Veeam could also be used to replicate the data to the second NAS, but PSX's solution might be better.

                            scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • DashrenderD
                              Dashrender @DustinB3403
                              last edited by

                              @DustinB3403 said:

                              So the client doesn't want to spend on hardware, but is willing to spend on software to use the equipment they have; to implement an onsite/offsite backup solution.

                              Correct?

                              Are Disks even on the table to be purchased?

                              Maybe, I guess it would depend on why you want disks? Is it to follow PSX's suggestion?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403
                                last edited by

                                Well you need space to keep backups, and you didn't specify how much free space you had on these NAS units.

                                And if you're wanting to use them for backup, you're going to want RAID 10 (for spinning rust) which is going to consume a good amount of space.

                                So to recoup that space, get larger disk and build the array out of those.

                                DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • PSX_DefectorP
                                  PSX_Defector @Dashrender
                                  last edited by

                                  @Dashrender said:

                                  @PSX_Defector said:

                                  Didn't say what NAS they have, but NetApp has the ever so useful Snapmirror, which will replicate all the data to another device automagically.

                                  http://www.netapp.com/us/products/protection-software/snapmirror.aspx

                                  Performing replication is gonna depend on how fast they want to recover. Using things like Veeam to send data back and forth is fine, but the delta would be kind of a problem. Using snapmirror would replicate in real time and recovery would be within seconds.

                                  I would beef up the two servers, slap all of the VMs on one, run Veeam to clone across to the secondary for local redundancy, keep critical data on the NAS and shuffle the data over to the offsite backup with the other NAS.

                                  This would require a significant storage purchase at minimum, but not a bad idea, assuming the system will hold enough disk that is.

                                  Considering what they are probably using, I bet it wouldn't cost much. We ain't talking about my Cisco UCS blades with NetApp SANs. I would bet the "server" is some off the shelf junk from Fry's and the NASes are some kind of Buffalo device. Don't bother with PCI-E SSDs and fancy Fibre Channel SANs, this is fairly simple in the grand scheme of things. Some high quality SATA would do them just fine.

                                  First, take the first machine and P2V it into the second machine. No point leaving it bare metal. Then take the first machine, nuke and pave then install Hyper-V or ESXi stand alone. Move your three VMs over to the first machine, nuke and pave the second machine with Hyper-V or ESXi, setup Veeam replication between them, then map the NAS through whatever way you need to for it to keep data onsite and off.

                                  DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • DashrenderD
                                    Dashrender @DustinB3403
                                    last edited by

                                    @DustinB3403 said:

                                    Well you need space to keep backups, and you didn't specify how much free space you had on these NAS units.

                                    And if you're wanting to use them for backup, you're going to want RAID 10 (for spinning rust) which is going to consume a good amount of space.

                                    So to recoup that space, get larger disk and build the array out of those.

                                    Aww.. you're right. The purpose of the NASs is to be the backup storage. They will go with either RAID 10 or RAID 6 depending on how much storage they feel they need. The NAS doesn't need to be the fastest thing in world.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender @PSX_Defector
                                      last edited by

                                      @PSX_Defector said:

                                      First, take the first machine and P2V it into the second machine. No point leaving it bare metal. Then take the first machine, nuke and pave then install Hyper-V or ESXi stand alone. Move your three VMs over to the first machine, nuke and pave the second machine with Hyper-V or ESXi, setup Veeam replication between them, then map the NAS through whatever way you need to for it to keep data onsite and off.

                                      WOW, this ends up with 4 copies of the data, probably overkill for them.

                                      I'm guessing they only have two server because the first one ran out of resources and storage slots, so they bought a second one. I have no idea how old the servers are, or what brand (though I'd guess Dell knowing my friend), etc.

                                      PSX_DefectorP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                        last edited by

                                        @Dashrender said:

                                        @PSX_Defector said:

                                        Didn't say what NAS they have, but NetApp has the ever so useful Snapmirror, which will replicate all the data to another device automagically.

                                        http://www.netapp.com/us/products/protection-software/snapmirror.aspx

                                        Performing replication is gonna depend on how fast they want to recover. Using things like Veeam to send data back and forth is fine, but the delta would be kind of a problem. Using snapmirror would replicate in real time and recovery would be within seconds.

                                        I would beef up the two servers, slap all of the VMs on one, run Veeam to clone across to the secondary for local redundancy, keep critical data on the NAS and shuffle the data over to the offsite backup with the other NAS.

                                        This would require a significant storage purchase at minimum, but not a bad idea, assuming the system will hold enough disk that is.

                                        That's how data safety works - lots of copies. If you want a good, reliable onsite storage and a good, reliable offsite one you are going to have to have a lot of copies for all of that to exist.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @Dashrender said:

                                          @scottalanmiller said:

                                          @gjacobse said:

                                          Are they looking to replace both with new hardware? or just reallocate what they have?

                                          Good question. A single new server would handle everything here easily. But as he mentioned available capacity (how did you determine that only 1 vCPU was available - that's not how capacity works) it seems like they are trying to use what they have currently.

                                          Was there supposed to be a reply on this one? There is a blank quote above.

                                          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                            last edited by

                                            @Dashrender said:

                                            I've updated the first post a bit.

                                            My associate said that they are sure there are enough resources to load up an additional VM and give is approx 40 GB of storage on the host. As for the 1 VCPU and 4 GB RAM, I was guesstimating that we could pull at least that amount of resources for this additional VM.

                                            4GB of RAM is easy to determine, as that is just a question of "is there 4GB of RAM available?" So I get that. But 1vCPU is not a measurement of anything. That could be nearly all the power of the box or effectively nothing. That he stated it that way would worry me because it indicates that he is confused about what a vCPU is and is confusing it with a physical core and is overbuilding his servers by a huge degree trying to not let the hypervisor share resources.

                                            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post