Better Than Aliens
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@RojoLoco said:
I had reported his posts and profile, but the proof of his teenage-ness posted on ML was what finally got the over sensitive mod to axe him. His apparent selling of freeware was ok, but being 12 was not. #confusingstandards
What proof was over here?
Someone posted a link to his FB or something which showed pictures of the kid. It was way down some random thread, I'd never find it again.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@RojoLoco said:
I had reported his posts and profile, but the proof of his teenage-ness posted on ML was what finally got the over sensitive mod to axe him. His apparent selling of freeware was ok, but being 12 was not. #confusingstandards
What proof was over here?
I found the links in my SW messages
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcBGlDPcUzzXyMEZQtCe0cA
https://www.facebook.com/loganjohnson2194
https://plus.google.com/+LoganLJohnsongardenpcbiltmoregeek/posts
https://www.facebook.com/xmas1420...but I still don't remember who posted it here. They were bashing his site (well deserved).
-
Oh right, because we found the Facebook site or whatever where he actually said that he was a kid.
-
Not that being a kid should get you booted alone, but when you were as illegal and reckless as he was.
-
@johnhooks said:
This is a beauty http://www.djfixxx.com/
This, but, I, he.... doh.....
This must be archived...
-
@Reid-Cooper said:
@johnhooks said:
This is a beauty http://www.djfixxx.com/
This, but, I, he.... doh.....
This must be archived...
Remember, if you're looking for his DJ site it's not that one.
-
@johnhooks said:
Remember, if you're looking for his DJ site it's not that one.
Oh right, it's the other one. This site is the ..... what is this one?
-
@Reid-Cooper said:
@johnhooks said:
Remember, if you're looking for his DJ site it's not that one.
Oh right, it's the other one. This site is the ..... what is this one?
Well it says it will "reflect personal fun and IT Technical issues along with some DJ Technical Info"
I have no idea....
-
Don't forget that what we were looking at was the first iteration of his site. There is a new one. Thank goodness it got updated...
-
@Reid-Cooper said:
Don't forget that what we were looking at was the first iteration of his site. There is a new one. Thank goodness it got updated...
-
This was an.... improvement? He actually sat down, took the time to make this second site to replace the first one?
-
And here is more Curtis at his best
-
@Reid-Cooper said:
@johnhooks said:
This is a beauty http://www.djfixxx.com/
This, but, I, he.... doh.....
This must be archived...
Should we DDOS both of his sites?
-
@DustinB3403 said:
And here is more Curtis at his best
I'd vote for that in my work place & take transit to work every day
-
-
-
They delete a lot of his stuff. Sadly his craziest stuff all gets deleted so no one knows just how insane he truly is.
-
Mods should be collecting the best deletions for a book... entitled "SpiceCrazies: Why You Shouldn't Just Let Anyone With an Email Address Join Your Forum"
-
I agree. I think that it is important not to delete too freely because a lot of important references as to why certain people or companies cannot be trusted gets hidden. The guilty often actually get protected by deleting their worst posts.
-
The thing is, He wasn't even the original author to the topic.
The topic was regarding a CEO who requested that he have access to every mailbox in the organization, and HE just happened to respond with the above.
To which my reply was "What are you on about Curtis?"
Not sure why the topic was removed in it's entirety.
