@Reid-Cooper said:

@thecreativeone91 I thought that the HTML5 spec was going to have specific file and codec types specified. Was that dropped?

No. it just provides a way to present the video. It's up to the browser to support the codec. H.264 is the most common, but even then there are differnt types as it's a GOP codec there's I frames and P frames. where I frames are key frames and P frames are rendered by the computer as inbetween frames at the time of playback using a lot more cpu. All I frames take less cpu usage but are much bigger in size.

@thecreativeone91 said:

I think they are just worried the government will over reach like they do in many other things.

This is why I did not want Title II applied. I worked for an ILEC for years and I know just how much of a f[moderated]ed up mess that it made of things when DSL was rolled out back in 2000.

I have never been against network neutrality principles, but Title II was not the best way to go about it.

By using Title II, I expect the ILECs to bring all their lawyers in, and those lawyers already know Title II inside and out. This is going to turn in to a complete cluster f[moderated].

@scottalanmiller said:

That is odd, to be sure. That really makes Access so much less useful. Which is saying something because it was never very useful.

How many times can we stress this. Gods, Access needs to die in nuclear fire.

Like @tonyshowoff says I do not think they ever led. Firefox was good for a brief time, but I too always feel it is too slow to use.

I use Chrome or Safari as my default browser. I pop IE to test things and even more rarely I'll pop Firefox to test something.

That's a great idea. Cheap enough that I can imagine lots and lots of people deciding to invest in one of those.

I'll be grabbing CCleaner for my Transformer Prime when I get home.
That thing runs like a sleepy Hutt going up a greased hill.

Cool, the first move from VPS to Cloud.

@Chamele0n said:

@mlnews said:

is Google Wireless the next big step

Google has been providing WiFi to Silicon Valley for quite some time, I would think with their fiber rollout the next big step could be to use the fiber as a backbone and provide WiFi.

From the Article it's not going to be Wifi but, more like cellular with a new frequency spectrum. Which is odd to change it up either way, especially since their target is cell phone users.

You're late 🙂

http://www.mangolassi.it/topic/4120/is-google-wireless-coming-next

@thecreativeone91 said:

@Reid-Cooper said:

That's pretty scary. Makes an argument for just hanging up and not messing with them. This takes it far beyond scamming. This is now threatening and extortion.

Scary but not quite as scary as ISIS using DMCA request to get american's personal information http://www.reddit.com/r/news/comments/2lgot5/terrorists_used_false_dmca_claims_to_get_personal/

Well as the goals of ISIS and of DMCA are both purely to hurt Americans, it makes sense that they would join forces.

It's all fun and games till someone screams "car jacking" and legally runs them all over.

Data prisoning is a big deal. You need companies with clear paths to data migration. Something very important to ask when getting into a situation where a vendor holds your critical data.

Firefox has had a nightly build of 64bit for a few years, I've used it quite a bit, it was late 2011 or early 2012 they started doing that.