ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Virtualization Redemption?

    IT Discussion
    virtualization hyperv xenserver xen esxi storagecraft rsync unitrends drbd proxy drbd veeam
    13
    208
    143.0k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • H
      hubtechagain
      last edited by

      so my question is this. wont Xen do this for free? if i'm going to the "trouble" of switching hypervisors, why not go with one that includes the tools i need and client will be happy to not have to pay for licensing. now i dont know xen, but it can't be all that terrible to tinker with.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch
        last edited by

        Veeam Backup Essentials Standard is $899 per 2 sockets. Sold in 2 socket packs. I have never seen it sold in any other fashion.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
          last edited by

          @JaredBusch said:

          Veeam Backup Essentials Standard is $899 per 2 sockets. Sold in 2 socket packs. I have never seen it sold in any other fashion.

          So basically $2700 in this scenario. That adds up quickly.

          DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            Paging @Steven

            StevenS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch
              last edited by JaredBusch

              @scottalanmiller said:

              So basically $2700 in this scenario. That adds up quickly.

              When I first talked to a Veeam rep a year ago about a similar scenario I was told I would not need a license for the 3rd host assuming it was only a DR site being replicated to and not from. So $1800, and that is a one time cost with Veeam unless you choose to continue maintenance for updates and upgrades.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                last edited by scottalanmiller

                @JaredBusch said:

                @scottalanmiller said:

                So basically $2700 in this scenario. That adds up quickly.

                When I first talked to a Veeam rep a year ago about a similar scenario I was told I would not need a license for the 3rd host assuming it was only a DR site being replicated to and not from. So $1800, and that is a one time cost with Veeam unless you choose to continue maintenance for updates and upgrades.

                Oh okay, that's 33% less then. Still not small, but not nearly so bad.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JaredBuschJ
                  JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  If I knew a way to do incremental offsite on Xen, that would be a good solution just like Hyper-V.

                  Only system I have experience with incremental is Hyper-V + Veeam, so that is all I can recommend.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403 @hubtechagain
                    last edited by

                    @hubtechagain said:

                    Just to Re-Cap here is our ultimate goal with this client.

                    Currently we are running and will continue to run server 2008 R2. So Hyper-V would be 08r2 which i've heard nobody really likes.
                    Currently have 3 hosts, each exactly the same 64GB of ram and 2.2TB raid 10.
                    Going to re-purpose one host to become a DR server colocated in a datacenter about 600 miles away(not an important detail but whatever).
                    We want the VMs running on the two "main site" servers to be replicated to the DR server nightly. I dont want to have to log in and start a backup job every night.... I will need the backup to be able to do incrementals because The 3 VMs that i'm talking about moving totaled together for more than the capacity of 1 server, so i'm going to get two more 600gb drives and switch to raid6 on our DR server. So nightly backups of 2+ TB ain't gonna happen, hense incremental after the initial snapshot. I'm now looking for the most reasonable way to accomplish this.

                    So, do i stick with ESX and get essentials for 666 bucks, and if so what backup do i use?
                    Do i switch do xen for the cost of me doing the work? if so what backup solution do i use?
                    Do i switch to Hyper-V 08r2? what backup solution do i use?

                    Thanks for everything guys!

                    Jump Ship with ESXi, the client will be paying way to much for what they need today vs what they'll want tomorrow.
                    The tools to do what you need just aren't available without a higher tier ESXi

                    Convert to XenServer download NAUBackup, and schedule the jobs with Crontab.

                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      @DustinB3403 said:

                      Convert to XenServer download NAUBackup, and schedule the jobs with Crontab.

                      That would be a big cost savings. But how do we make the jump from getting a local image file from the NAUBackup and then get that to incrementally / delta sync up to the DR site? That's the challenge in that scenario.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • H
                        hubtechagain
                        last edited by

                        Dustin, is NAUbackup incremental?

                        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • DustinB3403D
                          DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          You can run NAUBackup as often as the client can deal with the server going down.

                          I can run it on my VM's 8 times a day, and no one would notice.

                          The entire process takes a matter of seconds per VM.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @hubtechagain
                            last edited by

                            @hubtechagain said:

                            Dustin, is NAUbackup incremental?

                            Not on its own. There is probably a way to do an incremental transfer, but I've not thought of a good way to do it yet. It's the start of a decent solution but is missing a big piece.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @DustinB3403
                              last edited by

                              @DustinB3403 said:

                              You can run NAUBackup as often as the client can deal with the server going down.

                              I can run it on my VM's 8 times a day, and no one would notice.

                              The entire process takes a matter of seconds per VM.

                              None of that is incremental.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DustinB3403D
                                DustinB3403
                                last edited by DustinB3403

                                And to be clear, with NAUBackup, you're building Full restores, not Incrementals.

                                If you need a file level incrementals what OS is the client using on the VM? Can you use a local client like Storagecraft?

                                JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  Hub's goal here is not actually to do an incremental backup but to only transfer deltas to the DR site. Incrementals is just how he is envisioning doing it and how nearly any tool will work. Reid's DRBD Proxy idea does it differently but as he pointed out, isn't trivial to set up. There are tools that can get you there, but incrementals or deltas are critical to making it work.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    We COULD use a tool like RSYNC to do a delta transfer of full backups. But that is only efficient if the backups append nearly always, not if the data is changing all over the image. We want something with the rough equivalent of change-block tracking. That's where the Veeam, Unitrends, StorageCraft or even DRBD Proxy solutions come in, they all talk to the underlying storage and can do deltas in a way that RSYNC can't do given that we are talking about enormous filesystem images.

                                    So I think that RSYNC becomes useless here, sadly.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • DashrenderD
                                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                                      last edited by

                                      @scottalanmiller said:

                                      @JaredBusch said:

                                      Veeam Backup Essentials Standard is $899 per 2 sockets. Sold in 2 socket packs. I have never seen it sold in any other fashion.

                                      So basically $2700 in this scenario. That adds up quickly.

                                      Why would you need it for the third box? should only need it for the two local ones.

                                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @DustinB3403
                                        last edited by

                                        @DustinB3403 said:

                                        If you need a file level incrementals what OS is the client using on the VM? Can you use a local client like Storagecraft?

                                        Yeah, you are missing the point. He is not doing anything with the OS. All full backup solution for VMWare/Hyper-V have ways to push only the delta/incremental since the last backup. This has nothing to do with the OS. It is all VM level.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • scottalanmillerS
                                          scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                                          last edited by

                                          @Dashrender said:

                                          @scottalanmiller said:

                                          @JaredBusch said:

                                          Veeam Backup Essentials Standard is $899 per 2 sockets. Sold in 2 socket packs. I have never seen it sold in any other fashion.

                                          So basically $2700 in this scenario. That adds up quickly.

                                          Why would you need it for the third box? should only need it for the two local ones.

                                          Did not realize that the restore machine would not need it, but makes sense. Jared cleared that up for me.

                                          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • JaredBuschJ
                                            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            Did not realize that the restore machine would not need it, but makes sense. Jared cleared that up for me.

                                            I would reconfirm that with Veeam if @hubtechagain goes that route. I ended up not using the 3 host scenario. But it does make sense and the sale rep was upfront on that device not needing the license.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 5
                                            • 6
                                            • 7
                                            • 8
                                            • 9
                                            • 10
                                            • 11
                                            • 6 / 11
                                            • First post
                                              Last post