Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@Obsolesce said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
False advertisement maybe at best IMO.
Imagine if a company sold you a secure VPN solution. Then publicly gave away your key so that anyone could hack into your communications. That would be a crime.
You mean like NordVPN losing their private keys?
-
It's a bad sign when questions about security from your clients have to go through your lawyer every time.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@scottalanmiller said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@Obsolesce said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
False advertisement maybe at best IMO.
Imagine if a company sold you a secure VPN solution. Then publicly gave away your key so that anyone could hack into your communications. That would be a crime.
You mean like NordVPN losing their private keys?
Losing isn't the same as giving away knowingly.
-
@flaxking said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
It's a bad sign when questions about security from your clients have to go through your lawyer every time.
Sadly, if their customers try to access their own data the vendor sues them. They claim that the customers don't have the right to use the public keys that they give away.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@flaxking said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
It's a bad sign when questions about security from your clients have to go through your lawyer every time.
Sadly, if their customers try to access their own data the vendor sues them. They claim that the customers don't have the right to use the public keys that they give away.
You client is running into that issue now?
and how did the vendor find out?
-
@Dashrender said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@scottalanmiller said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@flaxking said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
It's a bad sign when questions about security from your clients have to go through your lawyer every time.
Sadly, if their customers try to access their own data the vendor sues them. They claim that the customers don't have the right to use the public keys that they give away.
You client is running into that issue now?
and how did the vendor find out?
We know a client that is having this issue. He posts about it. They found out because he let others know how to access their own data and exposed that the encryption wasn't unique: that they all shared a single key.
The knowledge can be used, obviously, to sue the vendor out of existence (and it ties back to EMR stuff, so while this one key isn't HIPAA related, the company is) and can be used to migrate customer data off of their platforms (the real reason that they are trying to encrypt the data - to extort the customers for migration fees.)
-
So in this case, while not nearly as bad as most, it's actually ransonware, right?
-
In this case would the definition of "encryption" be relevant? It's pretty vague as is. This is super fucked at any rate. I hope all the bad things in life happen to that company and only that company.
-
@G-I-Jones said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
In this case would the definition of "encryption" be relevant? It's pretty vague as is. This is super fucked at any rate. I hope all the bad things in life happen to that company and only that company.
I think it does because the Fed defines encryption in all kinds of things like HIPAA.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
So in this case, while not nearly as bad as most, it's actually ransonware, right?
Wouldn't that apply to any system that prevents you from extracting your data, unless you pay a fee?
-
@Dashrender said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@scottalanmiller said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
So in this case, while not nearly as bad as most, it's actually ransonware, right?
Wouldn't that apply to any system that prevents you from extracting your data, unless you pay a fee?
If it does so by maliciously encrypting your data to their benefit, not yours, yes. Generally that's considered illegal. Hence the term "ransomware". It refers to using encryption to make you unable to access your own data so that you have to pay a ransom to get it back.
-
And, like a lot of ransomware, it also means that someone else has access to your data that you do not.
-
In the state of Colorado the law is written such that if an encryption key is obtained the data is considered compromised.
-
@Kelly said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
In the state of Colorado the law is written such that if an encryption key is obtained the data is considered compromised.
Obtained by whom? The customers, the vendors, someone else?
Does that mean if the rightful customer has the key, that they must consider their system compromised even though they should have the key?
-
@Kelly said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
In the state of Colorado the law is written such that if an encryption key is obtained the data is considered compromised.
That's the case in most places, I think, but good to know as we have loads of people in CO with this.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@Kelly said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
In the state of Colorado the law is written such that if an encryption key is obtained the data is considered compromised.
Obtained by whom? The customers, the vendors, someone else?
Does that mean if the rightful customer has the key, that they must consider their system compromised even though they should have the key?
It is a privacy law. If someone who is not authorized has both the data and the key the data is considered to have been exposed and the company is liable under HB11-1828. If the key is public then any access to the data would be considered a breach and exposure.
-
@Kelly said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
not authorized
Gotcha, so it's not a poorly written law but only applies in the case of not authorized cases.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@Kelly said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
not authorized
Gotcha, so it's not a poorly written law but only applies in the case of not authorized cases.
Well, it will need to fleshed out via case law to determine what unauthorized really means and how you can verify the access or prove non access. The control is ahead of technology implementation in most organizations. We will see how it plays out. It is written in sufficiently broad terms that the access could be from an external access or an internal one.
-
@Kelly said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@DustinB3403 said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
@Kelly said in Is It Really Encrypted When the Key Is Public and Automatic?:
In the state of Colorado the law is written such that if an encryption key is obtained the data is considered compromised.
Obtained by whom? The customers, the vendors, someone else?
Does that mean if the rightful customer has the key, that they must consider their system compromised even though they should have the key?
It is a privacy law. If someone who is not authorized has both the data and the key the data is considered to have been exposed and the company is liable under HB11-1828. If the key is public then any access to the data would be considered a breach and exposure.
What if it was non-encrypted data, so that there was no key? Wouldn't that be the normal boat, and that's not an exposure.
-
The issue in this case is that the data is not required to be encrypted. But it's sold as a benefit. But it isn't like a HIPAA violation.
