How many of you...
-
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
-
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
You would, but it's not related to free speech.
-
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
You would, but it's not related to free speech.
We've been down this road with @DustinB3403 before. He has no idea what things actually mean.
-
@jaredbusch said in How many of you...:
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
You would, but it's not related to free speech.
We've been down this road with @DustinB3403 before. He has no idea what things actually mean.
Free speech is a discussion of public domain, just like a new paper or whatever other medium you choose. So much like a new paper, what is posted there and would be visible by someone walking down the road (randomly browsing a website) is public domain.
With that, I'd said the conversation we're having and dealing with lately would fall into "protected by free speech" category.
-
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@jaredbusch said in How many of you...:
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
@murica said in How many of you...:
@dustinb3403 Just because you say something doesn't make it true.
Anyone who says "you better stop people from talking about us on ML" certainly is attempting to oppress free speech. Just like cultofanarchy.org is posting the results from a nutanix test.
You can't suppress free speech.
That would be like Donald Trump sending you a C&D letter because you live in China and are talking shit about him. You'd rightfully tell him to pound sand.
You would, but it's not related to free speech.
We've been down this road with @DustinB3403 before. He has no idea what things actually mean.
Free speech is a discussion of public domain, just like a new paper or whatever other medium you choose. So much like a new paper, what is posted there and would be visible by someone walking down the road (randomly browsing a website) is public domain.
That's not a good example since a newspaper is definitely not public domain. Public domain is a reference to ownership of the content, not a reference to where it can be viewed. Where something can be viewed is of no consequence to a discussion of freedom of speech. That is not a factor in that in any way.
A newspaper, unless it is published with tax dollars by the government, is not public in any sense. It is privately owned, is not covered by freedom laws other than its own right to publish, and can choose to whom it can be sold. It is covered by copyright.
-
@dustinb3403 said in How many of you...:
With that, I'd said the conversation we're having and dealing with lately would fall into "protected by free speech" category.
It does not. People are not bound by freedom of speech, the government is. Freedom of speech keeps the government from censoring you, it doesn't affect citizens. It's a right given to citizens to protect them from the government.
-
@scottalanmiller said in How many of you...:
It's a right given to citizens to protect them from the government.
" It's a right given to citizens to protect them from the government."....
BAM!!! Bill of rights. Summed up. One sentence. -
Last time I logged in I had a new
up from SAM, so I've apparently missed something. -
@flaxking said in How many of you...:
Last time I logged in I had a new
up from SAM, so I've apparently missed something.Yep, you missed it
-
@wls-itguy said in How many of you...:
So how long before SodiumSuite can do all of what
can do?Is there already any reason to be using
software vs other free alternative? -
@flaxking said in How many of you...:
@wls-itguy said in How many of you...:
So how long before SodiumSuite can do all of what
can do?Is there already any reason to be using
software vs other free alternative?Not that I know Of.
